 |
Is It Time to Buy This Market? No Way! |
I watch an extraordinary amount of business television given what I do for a living.
When I hear people from the money management industry go on the air and say that "The bottom is in and it's time to put money to work," I get a little sick. Not as sick as I do watching Barney Frank talk economics to his fellow Congressman, but sick nonetheless.
I'm sickened because I know that there are tons of investors out there who listened to these "Johnny-One-Notes" for the past 12 months. And those investors are now looking at 40%-50% losses, and need 100% gains or more just to break even. Sadly, many of those individuals simply do not have that much time left.
It is an indisputable fact that the guys who get paid to manage money based on the amount of money they manage have an incredible blind spot (I'm being kind here) to the business of investing for capital growth.
"Riding out" the bear markets fully invested is an absolutely insane approach to investing in an age when it costs so little to get defensive, when so many people have loss carryforwards that make these moves tax-free (or are in tax-exempt accounts), and when economic surveys like the ones we get from the ChangeWave Alliance are so accurate!
Don't Fall For Their Bull
When asked about the stock market, the professional money managers on TV repeat the same, old mantra: "Stay fully invested. When the market goes bear, buy more. When the market goes bull, rebalance your portfolio at year-end."
This concept is simply BS. Not just because if you followed it you would have zero investment gains since 1998. And not because those money managers or stock brokers don't get paid on your cash balances -- those fees or spreads go to the house.
It's bull because it does not adequately reflect the risk of owning stocks versus owning cash/bonds/short exchange-traded funds (ETFs) during periods of contracting economic growth.
Stocks are valued on an estimate of future earnings times a multiple of those earnings.
Cyclical stocks get a lower multiple because their earnings are cyclical. Secular growth stocks get a higher multiple because their future earnings are growth at a multiple to overall GDP growth.
At ChangeWave Investing, our strategy is to get defensive when our forward-looking surveys show that consumer and corporate aggregate demand and sales are headed 20% or more south.
In other words, we go on the defensive when our survey data unequivocally show that an economic recession is coming (like it did in January 2001 and January 2008).
By going defensive I mean that we sell 50% or more of our equity positions, getting out of any stocks that are close to our full-value calculations or not performing up to expectations, and hedging our portfolio with double-short bear market ETFs.
We do this because we know that investors will not be willing to pay the same multiple for growth and cyclical stocks going into, and during, the upcoming recession. When an economic contraction is coming, an earnings recession is coming, too. And our goal is to buy stocks when an earnings wave is ahead of us, not behind us.
Remember, the most value is created in stocks when the prospect for earnings growth is the easiest to forecast. The most value is taken out of stocks when earnings growth is hardest to forecast.
Utilizing our proprietary ChangeWave research, we are able to look ahead 90 to 120 days via our forward-looking sales pipeline and spending surveys.
Until the financial system meltdown that started with the Bear Stearns debacle, we were forecasting a relatively normal recession that would bring the Dow (DJI) to around 9,000. However, when the financial system collapsed, we were forced to change our outlook.
No Hope For a V-Shaped Recovery
Due to what I now call the Great Financial CrashWave of 2008-2009, we lowered our 2009 earnings estimates to reflect the financial system cataclysm. Our current model suggests $52-$55 per share for S&P 500 (SPX) earnings.
What multiple should be applied?
Old schoolers say at the earnings trough you can pay a 15-17 multiple, because when earnings recover, you are really paying a 12-14 multiple.
My problem with this analysis is that it presumes a V-shaped recovery in late 2009-2010. A sharp recovery is simply not possible. Not when 2%-3% of nominal GDP in the United States between 2003and 2006 came from mortgage equity withdrawals (MEW).
Take a look at the following charts, courtesy of the Fed:
In 2005, there was almost $695 billion in mortgage extractions that went into some kind of consumer spending. According to the graph above, that translated into around a 3% rise in GDP.
In 2007, MEWs were down to about $470 billion, for a 2% boost to GDP.

For the second quarter of 2008, MEWs came in at just $9.5 billion. Third-quarter 2008 consumer spending was down 3.1%.
For the economy to right itself, it needs oxygen to fuel the recovery. Without $500 billion of cash to spend, we will likely see an L-shaped market for a while, not a V-shaped one.
The following two charts should tell you everything you need to know about the earnings power for companies in Q4 2008:
Consumer Spending
Corporate Spending

Just wait until the 2009 earnings revisions start to take effect.
As you can see, our forward-looking survey results confirm that it is far too early to start buying stocks as though the bottom was in.

Toby
P.S. Every Monday, we bring our ChangeWave Investing subscribers the latest results from the ChangeWave Alliance Research Network, along with specific investment recommendations to profit from these findings. Become a ChangeWave Investing member now with a risk-free, 90-day trial.
|